Week 2 Discussion: 912 Petition
Apr. 2nd, 2009 11:28 amI actually wrote something on Saturday for this week's discussion (apolgies for not posting yesterday; first day of vacation!), but I came across this petition on Tuesday. The website is www.912petitions.com. I figured it was a very good summation of pretty much what I believe in now which is probably pretty beneficial for you guys to know considering that I'm writing these analyses and my previous Party Apologist methods were only officially put to death in December. I don't know enough about two of the issues to agree or disagree with them yet, but the petition is otherwise excellent.
If you agree with it, please sign it online or print it out HERE if you want your actual John Hancock on it. ;) If you don't agree, then I ask you to consider the questions that are asked and even post your disagreements here.
Excerpt from Cover Letter Background Info:
The United States Constitution is a LIMITING document.
If authority is not enumerated, it has not been granted by We the People of the United States of America.
Petition for Redress of Grievances
To the United States Congress, United States Supreme Court and President of the United States:
Whereas, the First Amendment guarantees our right to Petition for Redress of Grievances, and
Whereas, the Senators and Representatives, all executives and judicial officers of the United States are bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution, and
Whereas, the Ninth and Tenth Amendments provide that powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people, and
Whereas, the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal protection of the laws, and
Whereas, Article 1 of the Constitution prohibits both the federal government and the states from passing either bills of attainder or ex post facto laws, and
Whereas, the Supreme Court has insisted that "a Bill of Attainder may affect the life of an individual, or may confiscate his property, or may do both”, and
Whereas, “All laws which are repugnant to the constitution are null and void” (Marbury v Madison, 5 US (2Cranch) 137, 174, 176 (1803)) and,
Whereas, We the People, have been betrayed through treachery and breach of allegiance, by those entrusted with the responsibility to safe guard our liberty and the United States Constitution,
We the People, in seeking Redress of Grievances, as is our right under Amendment I of the United States Constitution, ask this question of each branch of Federal Government:
“Where in the Constitution do you find authorization for each and all of the following?”
( The Petition continues... )